Why? Well, consider the following facts:
- This year, Patrick Mahomes was the #1 QB, and it wasn't close. On the season, under our scoring system, he outscored the #2 QB (Matt Ryan?) by 91 points.
- At the same time, the difference between Ryan and the #15 QB (Dak Prescott) was also basically 91 points.
- This means that, in a given week, unless you had Mahomes as your starter, it didn't really matter who your QB was. You could reasonably expect that your QB would score within 1-2 points of your opponent's QB.
I'm too lazy to do the research on previous seasons, but this year is fairly typical. Every year there's one (or two, or three) QBs who outscore the rest of the field by a substantial margin, and after that, the next 10-12 are all pretty much the same. Since we're a 12-team league and we only start 1 QB, that means that unless you're lucky enough to draft a stud, the QB position is irrelevant.
I also notice that practically everyone drafts 2 QBs, presumably to have a backup in place for the bye week, or in case of injury. But for the most part, a randomly-selected QB out of the waiver pool can do as well on a one-week fill-in basis as any QB you draft as your backup. This year, for example, you could have picked up Baker Mayfield, Jameis Winston, Sam Darnold, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Lamar Jackson, Josh Allen or Nick Mullens depending on the week, and they would have done just fine for you. So consequently, the standard league practice of drafting 2 QBs means that your backup QB is dead weight on your roster for most of the season. Also, it means if you have 2 really good QBs (Kevin had both Luck and Goff, for example), you can't ever trade the backup, because no one else isn't willing to give up anything for a small improvement at QB.
(Okay, Adam traded away Roethlisberger, but such trades are really rare).
The bottom line is, we should consider doing something to make the QB position more interesting. And the obvious solution is superflex.
If we adopt this rule, the QB position becomes much more interesting. Since it will now be possible to start 2 QBs in a week:
- QBs become a much hotter commodity in the draft, because if you manage to land TWO of the stud QBs, it gives you a huge edge. In turn, this will mean that stud players at other positions will be available in later rounds, making the whole draft more interesting.
- With only 1 starting QB, it doesn't much matter who your QB is, since there's not a lot of difference between the QB4 and the QB15. When we can start 2 QBs, suddenly there's lots of competition to get ANY starting QB --- even a player like Josh Johnson can be worthy of a waiver pickup.
- Because QBs will be in higher demand, there is likely to be more trade activity involving the QB position. Would you trade Chris Carson for Ryan Fitzpatrick? Suddenly that's not a stupid question.
- Bye weeks become more challenging (and hopefully more fascinating).
I want to particularly emphasize how much this rule change will affect the draft. This year, we drafted 21 QBs in the first 11 rounds. If we adopt this rule, I anticipate that 21 QBs will go in roughly the first 5 rounds. This is why I wanted to propose this rule change well before next year's draft.
Also, I shouldn't undersell the additional value this would give to the TE position. Maybe you try to corner the market on TE with Travis Kelce and Zach Ertz? Neither of those guys is going to score as much on a weekly basis as someone like Alex Smith (should he return), but it would be a nice double-threat when one of your QBs is on bye, or in case of a QB injury.
My thought is that we would simply change our existing flex spot to a superflex, but I'm open to the possibility of adding a superflex position to our starting lineup (and reducing bench size to 8 players, so we still have an 18 round draft).
As with the previous proposal, I'm not planning to schedule a vote on this change any time soon. Instead, I'll give everyone time to ponder, discuss, question, etc.
(Footnote: This rule change has been a long time coming. Does everyone remember my ill-fated attempt to eliminate the kicker position 5 years ago [yes, it has been five years]? That was the first step of a two-step plan I had, to eliminate the kicker and replace it with a superflex.
When all of you inexplicably told me how much you loved the kicker position, it foiled my plans. And it's taken me this long to take another stab at it).

